I am finally back from my whirlwind adventure (more on that soon), and one of my first tasks upon my return was to shoot some portraits for a friend. She was particularly interested in resume photos, but we also had some fun doing more relaxed photos outdoors. The idea of a resume photo was a new concept to me--as I've applied primarily for jobs in the U.S., I've never been expected to submit a photo with a job application. Obviously the idea is to select a photo which is professional, but hopefully also conveys a bit of your personality. In order to make sure that I shot at least a few that would serve the purpose, I shot a wide variety of photos, ranging from extremely serious to happy.
In addition to shooting several hundred photos in different settings, with different clothing and hairstyles, and featuring different expressions, I also applied a variety of editing techniques (black and white, sepia tone, vignetting) to add variety and really make the photos stand out from the pack. I did the majority of my editing in Adobe Lightroom 4--I'm using the free 30 day trial, and trying to get a feel for how the program differs from (and is similar to) Lightroom 3. Rather than having a simple fill flash slider, as was the case in LR 3, LR4 allows you to adjust highlights, shadows, whites, and blacks all independently. As a big fan of the highlight recovery feature in LR3, I'm pleased to see these additional features in LR4. However, the added control does also mean that adjusting the light in the photo takes a bit more tweaking than in the previous version of the program. I also found that adjusting the luminance--both the overall luminance and color-specific luminance as necessary--really helped to even skin tone.
At any rate, below are a few of my favorite photos from the shoot. As always, I'm grateful for constructive feedback!
Welcome to my blog. Recently I've been working on editing my old work, shooting some new photographs, mastering the art of digital editing, and learning how to share my photos online. To that end, I've started this blog in the hope that I will learn a few new tricks, receive some helpful feedback, and perhaps, with any luck at all, even find a few people who enjoy my work.
Showing posts with label fill flash. Show all posts
Showing posts with label fill flash. Show all posts
Friday, April 20, 2012
Wednesday, January 18, 2012
Let There Be Light...for 30 Days
I know I've been going on non-stop about GIMP, due largely to the fact that it is 1) powerful and 2) free. However, I've been persuaded to try Lightroom by Adobe on a free 30 day trial, and, I have to confess, I'm impressed. Obviously there are a lot of things that can be done in GIMP--in fact, it may be that GIMP can do everything Lightroom can. If so, I just haven't found a way of doing some specific things in GIMP yet. That being said, I'm really enjoying Lightroom. Granted, I haven't completed any tutorials, and I've only been playing around with the program for about two days. Even so, here's my run-down, followed by some before and after examples so you can see what I'm talking about:
Pros:
1) The program is pretty intuitive and user-friendly. As I said, I haven't done any tutorials yet, and I've been happily editing for two days.
2) The recovery feature is AWESOME if you have photos with high dynamic range. In other words, there's a tool that allows you to tone down some of the highlights in your photo--so if your insanely blonde friend looks like her head is glowing while everyone else looks normal, you can recover some of the color and contrast in her hair so that she looks a bit less like an alien.
3) You can independently tune your blacks, so you're not stuck fiddling with contrast and washing out your highlights when all you really want is to make your blacks a bit blacker.
4) The heal tool certainly isn't perfect--GIMP is a better choice for cloning. However, it's easy and quick, and does a great job on small spots and imperfections. For touch-up jobs, you can spend seconds instead of hours correcting minor blemishes in your photos.
5) The luminescence tool allows you to ditch some of the graininess in photos shot in low lighting. Crank it up too much and people begin to look like they've had too much plastic surgery. On a low setting, though, you can make your photos look a little softer/smoother without losing clarity.
6) There are lots of fun creative modes to play with to give your photo a unique look.
7) Lightroom won't overwrite your photos, so you don't have to worry about accidentally losing your originals.
8) Dodging and burning is a little different from the way it's handled in other programs, but it's quick and easy to learn, and you can do more than adjust exposure--you have options for brightness, clarity, sharpness, saturation, and contrast. Nice, huh?
Cons:
1) Adobe programs aren't cheap. In fact, I was ready to do a happy dance when I found Lightroom for $150 because on the Adobe site it's $300. However, you can do a 30 day trial for free on the Adobe site (which I'm doing before I part with $150).
2) I'm not impressed with the Autotone function. Lightroom is great for easily adjusting things by hand, but Autotone seems to like things to be really washed out and grainy. I imported a few photos with Autotone on by mistake and I struggled to get them looking normal; I couldn't believe I had taken such bad portraits at a paid gig. It was only when I reset the photo that I realized what had happened. Among other adjustments, the Autotone feature cranked the brightness and fill light way too high, and turned the contrast way down, and the photos looked overexposed and unfortunate.
3) Perhaps I'm just not looking in the right place, but it seems that all zooming is limited to preset values, so I spend a lot of time and effort fidgeting with 1:2 vs. 1:4 vs. 2:1 vs...you get the idea. Zooming into a specific area by a specific percentage seems to be an impossibility. If you know something I don't on this front, I'd love to hear that I'm wrong because the zooming is rather frustrating.
4) The program can watermark on export--this is a pro, except that it doesn't look like you can adjust the position or opacity of your watermark. Again, I'm new to the program, so maybe I'm missing something, but having the watermark in the lower left corner of the photo means that it will be pretty easy to crop out. Defeats the point of a watermark...
Alright, enough talk. Time to show you what I'm talking about. Below are a few before and afters. The first set of photos was from a film shoot, and when I scanned the photo, it was covered in dust, it looked grainy, and it just generally wasn't a very good representation of the original photo. Enter Lightroom. Obviously, it's still not perfect--there was some dust I will have to remove in GIMP, and I'd like to clean up the background a bit. However, for the speed and ease of editing, I was pretty pleased with the difference Lightroom made. Note: luminescence was particularly helpful for reducing the grain, and the heal tool was used to get rid of some of the dust and the big scratch on her arm from the original photograph.
Before:
After:
Before:
After:
Pros:
1) The program is pretty intuitive and user-friendly. As I said, I haven't done any tutorials yet, and I've been happily editing for two days.
2) The recovery feature is AWESOME if you have photos with high dynamic range. In other words, there's a tool that allows you to tone down some of the highlights in your photo--so if your insanely blonde friend looks like her head is glowing while everyone else looks normal, you can recover some of the color and contrast in her hair so that she looks a bit less like an alien.
3) You can independently tune your blacks, so you're not stuck fiddling with contrast and washing out your highlights when all you really want is to make your blacks a bit blacker.
4) The heal tool certainly isn't perfect--GIMP is a better choice for cloning. However, it's easy and quick, and does a great job on small spots and imperfections. For touch-up jobs, you can spend seconds instead of hours correcting minor blemishes in your photos.
5) The luminescence tool allows you to ditch some of the graininess in photos shot in low lighting. Crank it up too much and people begin to look like they've had too much plastic surgery. On a low setting, though, you can make your photos look a little softer/smoother without losing clarity.
6) There are lots of fun creative modes to play with to give your photo a unique look.
7) Lightroom won't overwrite your photos, so you don't have to worry about accidentally losing your originals.
8) Dodging and burning is a little different from the way it's handled in other programs, but it's quick and easy to learn, and you can do more than adjust exposure--you have options for brightness, clarity, sharpness, saturation, and contrast. Nice, huh?
Cons:
1) Adobe programs aren't cheap. In fact, I was ready to do a happy dance when I found Lightroom for $150 because on the Adobe site it's $300. However, you can do a 30 day trial for free on the Adobe site (which I'm doing before I part with $150).
2) I'm not impressed with the Autotone function. Lightroom is great for easily adjusting things by hand, but Autotone seems to like things to be really washed out and grainy. I imported a few photos with Autotone on by mistake and I struggled to get them looking normal; I couldn't believe I had taken such bad portraits at a paid gig. It was only when I reset the photo that I realized what had happened. Among other adjustments, the Autotone feature cranked the brightness and fill light way too high, and turned the contrast way down, and the photos looked overexposed and unfortunate.
3) Perhaps I'm just not looking in the right place, but it seems that all zooming is limited to preset values, so I spend a lot of time and effort fidgeting with 1:2 vs. 1:4 vs. 2:1 vs...you get the idea. Zooming into a specific area by a specific percentage seems to be an impossibility. If you know something I don't on this front, I'd love to hear that I'm wrong because the zooming is rather frustrating.
4) The program can watermark on export--this is a pro, except that it doesn't look like you can adjust the position or opacity of your watermark. Again, I'm new to the program, so maybe I'm missing something, but having the watermark in the lower left corner of the photo means that it will be pretty easy to crop out. Defeats the point of a watermark...
Alright, enough talk. Time to show you what I'm talking about. Below are a few before and afters. The first set of photos was from a film shoot, and when I scanned the photo, it was covered in dust, it looked grainy, and it just generally wasn't a very good representation of the original photo. Enter Lightroom. Obviously, it's still not perfect--there was some dust I will have to remove in GIMP, and I'd like to clean up the background a bit. However, for the speed and ease of editing, I was pretty pleased with the difference Lightroom made. Note: luminescence was particularly helpful for reducing the grain, and the heal tool was used to get rid of some of the dust and the big scratch on her arm from the original photograph.
Before:
After:
Before:
After:
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)










